|
Home Page Guardianship Services of Seattle
|
Date |
Title |
Brief Summary |
10/13/05 |
Petition for Discretionary Review to Supreme Court |
|
9/13/05 |
Order Denying Motions For Reconsideration, Motion to File Amicus Brief, and Changing Opinion |
Adds a footnote to the 4/18/05 decision re-stating the finding that workers were GSS employees |
8/1/2005 |
Appellant's Answer to Motion to Reconsider |
Argues in favor of the ruling |
7/13/2005 |
Court of Appeals Request for Answer to GSS Motion to Reconsider |
Suggests that the Court will rule on the reconsideration motion. |
5/12/2005 |
Memorandum of Amicus Curiae Supporting Reconsideration of Licensing requirement for Guardians of an Estate |
Filed by Michael Olver representing eight professional guardians and professional guardian agencies. |
5/9/2005 |
Guardianship Services of Seattle Motion to Reconsider |
Requests that the court reconsider that portion of its 4/18/2005 decision that requires any fiduciary who arranges home based care to be licensed under RCW 70.127 |
4/18/2005 |
Court of Appeals, Division One decision in the matter of Cummings v. GSS |
Provides in part, "[Caregivers] lived in Smith's home and provided round-the-clock services, including housekeeping, purchasing groceries, and preparing meals. These activities are home care services. GSS is therefore a home care agency required to be licensed under chapter 70.127 RCW.17" |